ClearRoutes
Last updatedElapsed time available with JavaScript
ReviewedSee each profile below
About these dates

Updated dates record content changes. Review dates record completed assessments, even when no changes are needed.

Side by side

Compare the details.

Choose up to three profiles. The same fields, clear differences and links to the evidence.

Three cross-chain profiles selected. Change a profile to compare another.

Compare the detailsTHORSwap ↗Chainflip ↗NEAR Intents ↗
Product typeCross-chain DEX aggregatorCross-chain liquidity protocolIntent-based execution system
Network scopeMultichain; route-dependentBitcoin, Ethereum, Solana + moreMultichain; verify asset support
MechanismAggregator interface over underlying swap providersCross-chain AMM and validator-secured vaultsIntent quotes and on-chain verification
Cost model0.5% above $100 + route costsNetwork + broker + routeInterface-dependent
Evidence statusSource-backedSource-backedSource-backed
AssessmentCompare THORSwap as an interface and route selector. Compare its selected provider separately. Treating THORSwap and THORChain as the same product hides important differences.A useful protocol-level comparison for native cross-chain swaps. Check whether you are comparing its own interface or an aggregator using Chainflip under the hood.A distinct execution model worth comparing with cross-chain AMMs. Review the particular app using NEAR Intents: the protocol and its distribution channels do not have one identical fee schedule.
Key questionWhich provider executes the chosen route, and what does the final output include?Are deposit, broadcast and broker costs included in the compared output?Which interface, fee configuration and asset route are you comparing?
Last updated2026-09-082026-09-212026-09-16
Reviewed5 Nov 20265 Nov 20265 Nov 2026
Custody / funds controlPublished policy

The interface says it does not hold assets; a third-party wallet and underlying execution providers are involved.

Scope: THORSwap interfaceTHORSwap terms of service (updated September 1, 2026) ↗Policy source checked
Published policy

The protocol uses validator-governed vaults and governance controls; users rely on those protocol assumptions during a swap.

Scope: Chainflip cross-chain protocolChainflip governance and security ↗Policy source checked
Published policy

The documentation describes atomic smart-contract settlement and non-custodial design. Interface and bridge assumptions need separate assessment.

Scope: NEAR Intents protocol overviewWhat are intents? ↗Policy source checked
RegistrationNot yet established in this profile.Not yet established in this profile.Not yet established in this profile.
Identity checks / KYCNot yet established in this profile.Not yet established in this profile.Not yet established in this profile.
Refund / failed-transfer termsNot yet established in this profile.Published policy

A refund address and retry duration are required. After retry exhaustion, unexecuted amounts return to the refund address; any completed DCA chunks are sent to the destination. Boost fees are not refunded.

Scope: Protocol slippage protection, including partial DCA refundsChainflip swapping basics ↗Policy source checked
Published policy

The overview states that unexecuted intents return funds to a refund address. Exact route and interface terms still apply.

Scope: Overview-level description, not a tested refundWhat are intents? ↗Policy source checked
Data retentionNot yet established in this profile.Not yet established in this profile.Not yet established in this profile.
Access restrictionsPublished policy

Terms exclude specified territories and sanctioned persons. Tokenized securities have additional issuer restrictions.

Scope: THORSwap interface; consult current eligibility termsTHORSwap terms of service (updated September 1, 2026) ↗Policy source checked
Not yet established in this profile.Not yet established in this profile.
Website & Tor
A side-by-side table does not make different product categories equivalent. Network scope is illustrative, not a live list of available routes. Read the full profiles for limitations.