ClearRoute
Last updatedElapsed time available with JavaScript
About these dates
Side by side

Compare the details.

Choose up to three profiles. The same fields, clear differences and links to the evidence.

Three cross-chain profiles selected. Change a profile to compare another.

Compare the detailsTHORSwap ↗Chainflip ↗NEAR Intents ↗
Product typeCross-chain DEX aggregatorCross-chain liquidity protocolIntent-based execution system
Network scopeMultichain; route-dependentBitcoin, Ethereum, Solana + moreMultichain; verify asset support
MechanismAggregator interface over underlying swap providersCross-chain AMM and validator-secured vaultsIntent quotes and on-chain verification
Cost modelInterface + route costsNetwork + broker + routeInterface-dependent
Evidence statusSource-backedSource-backedSource-backed
AssessmentCompare THORSwap as an interface and route selector. Compare its selected provider separately. Treating THORSwap and THORChain as the same product hides important differences.A useful protocol-level comparison for native cross-chain swaps. Check whether you are comparing its own interface or an aggregator using Chainflip under the hood.A distinct execution model worth comparing with cross-chain AMMs. Review the particular app using NEAR Intents: the protocol and its distribution channels do not have one identical fee schedule.
Key questionWhich provider executes the chosen route, and what does the final output include?Are deposit, broadcast and broker costs included in the compared output?Which interface, fee configuration and asset route are you comparing?
Last updated2026-09-052026-09-052026-09-07
Website & Tor
A side-by-side table does not make different product categories equivalent. Network scope is illustrative, not a live list of available routes. Read the full profiles for limitations.